The court ruled to consider the objection of a judgment in absentia as if it had not been issued. What does that mean?

Dear Questioner,

Thank you for your inquiry.

In response to your inquiry, the court has issued a ruling regarding the objection you filed against the judgment in absentia that was previously issued against you. The key points of the ruling are as follows:

Objection Consideration: The court has accepted your objection to the judgment issued in absentia, meaning that the judgment is no longer valid.

The ruling will be considered as if it was never issued, and the case will be reviewed again based on this new development.

Court Fees: As part of the ruling, you are required to pay the court fees associated with this process. This is standard practice when submitting an objection to a court decision.

Issued in the Name of His Highness: The ruling was formally issued in the name of His Highness the President of the UAE, which signifies its legal authority.

Please feel free to reach out if you need further clarification or assistance regarding the next steps in your case.

Best regards,

Mohammed Salah

Legal Consultant

Dear questioner

It means the case or objection filed by you was accepted and you need to pay a court fee which is a deposit in the court to intiate further. If you need further clarifications kindly share your whatsapp number.

Dear R.,

I hope this message finds you well. I would like to provide clarification regarding the court ruling issued on March 6, 2025, concerning R., an Indian national.

The court has ruled as follows:

1. Objection Considered Non-Existent: The objection submitted by Rahul to the judgment issued in absentia (i.e., without his presence) has been dismissed. The court has decided to treat the objection as though it had never been submitted.

2. Payment of Court Fees: Rahul has been ordered to pay the court fees associated with this matter.

3. Public Announcement of the Ruling: The ruling was publicly read on March 6, 2025, and issued in the name of His Highness the President of the State.

This means that the original judgment against R. remains valid and enforceable, as his attempt to challenge it through this objection was unsuccessful.

Should further clarification or legal action be required, consult with us to explore any remaining options for appeal or resolution under applicable laws is advisable.

Please feel free to let me know if you need any additional information or assistance regarding this matter.

Best regards,

Abdul Wahied

Greetings,

The court has accepted the objection filed by R. (Indian national) against the judgment in absentia, meaning the previous ruling is now considered as if it was never issued. However, he is required to pay the court fees.

This means the case will proceed, and R. will have the opportunity to defend himself. The next steps depend on the nature of the case and legal strategy.

For expert legal guidance, book a consultation or appoint "Future Vision for Advocacy and Legal Consultancy" to represent you.

We are happy at Future Vision Law Advocates and Legal Consultancy to assist you and provide the best legal services that meet your needs.

To contact us, you can call or WhatsApp us.

Hello from Badr Legal Consultants.

In simple terms, it means that his objection was accepted, and the previous judgment against him is essentially nullified.

He is still required to pay for the court’s costs in this matter. I require some more information for clearer guidance.

You can reach out to me by phone or share your contact details.

Thanks!